Wednesday

Colombian president advises Trump to distance himself from Netanyahu

CC™ Global News

By Staff

Colombian President Gustavo Petro has called on US President Donald Trump to distance himself from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu whom he said has been the cause of conflicts in the Middle East.

Petro gave the advice at the Friday funeral in Chicago of US civil rights leader Jesse Jackson.

The Colombian president who described Jackson as a “living symbol of the struggle for freedom” for people of African descent across the Americas, said the conflict in the Middle East should be opposed by all nations in the interest of humanity.

“Today is the time for the US president to completely separate himself from the person who is pushing humanity toward the abyss,” Petro said, adding that time has come for humanity to unite against the current conflict in the Middle East.

“It is time for all of us to come together because there is no weapon capable of stopping missiles, the only thing that can stand against them is the power of words backed by the masses, by all humanity.”

Blaming Netanyahu for the conflict, Petro stressed that peace in the Middle East must be achieved rapidly.

Petro’s remarks got strong applause from participants, with some standing in support.

During the ceremony, the Colombian leader was also seen briefly speaking with former US President Barack Obama.

Tuesday

NIGERIA’S PARADOX: OIL WEALTH AMIDST PERSISTENT POVERTY

CC™ Insight

By Oscar-Brian I. Ugo

Nigeria, often referred to as the "Giant of Africa" due to its vast population and abundant natural resources, is one of the world’s leading oil-producing nations. Despite possessing substantial oil reserves that might, in theory, secure widespread prosperity, the country continues to struggle with endemic poverty, high unemployment, and ongoing underdevelopment. This juxtaposition of immense wealth and persistent deprivation has perplexed analysts and citizens alike for decades. The key question that emerges is why a resource that has brought economic transformation to many nations has failed to lift millions of Nigerians out of poverty. The answer is embedded within a web of economic, political, and social challenges that continue to hinder the nation’s progress.

The discovery of oil in Nigeria in 1956 at Oloibiri represented a pivotal moment in the country’s history. With this discovery, expectations soared as both policymakers and the broader populace envisioned a future characterised by prosperity, modernisation, and international relevance driven by oil revenues. By the 1970s, oil became the cornerstone of the Nigerian economy, accounting for the majority of government revenue and export earnings. Unfortunately, this heavy reliance on oil ushered in a multitude of unforeseen complications. The hope of boundless wealth led to the systematic neglect of other important sectors, particularly agriculture and manufacturing, which had traditionally underpinned livelihoods and food security.

As oil revenues increased, a succession of governments became progressively dependent on this single commodity, often neglecting prudent economic planning and diversification. The initial optimism gave way to disillusionment as the gap between Nigeria’s potential and its everyday reality widened. Central to the nation’s predicament is the phenomenon known as the “resource curse,” whereby countries rich in natural resources paradoxically exhibit slower economic growth, weaker institutional frameworks, and greater social inequality compared to their less-endowed counterparts. In Nigeria’s case, oil has not served as a catalyst for broad-based development, but rather has fostered complacency and distorted economic incentives. The easy inflow of petrodollars discouraged investment in agriculture, industry, and technological advancement, resulting in a mono-economy precariously exposed to global oil price fluctuations.

Moreover, the resource curse has engendered a culture of rent-seeking among political and business elites, who often compete for access to oil revenues rather than encouraging productive enterprise. This dynamic has created a vicious cycle in which immediate personal gain is prioritised over the pursuit of sustainable development. The neglect of sectors outside oil has weakened Nigeria’s economic resilience and has contributed to widespread unemployment and deepening poverty, particularly in rural communities.

Corruption stands out as arguably the most formidable obstacle to Nigeria’s advancement. International watchdogs such as Transparency International have consistently ranked Nigeria among the world’s most corrupt nations, with the oil sector serving as a focal point for graft, mismanagement, and lack of transparency. Billions of dollars in potential revenue have been diverted by politicians, bureaucrats, and influential business figures, leaving scant resources for critical public investments in infrastructure, education, and healthcare. Weak institutions and a pervasive lack of accountability have made this situation possible; agencies tasked with overseeing oil operations are frequently undermined, while successive governments have fallen short in enacting and enforcing robust anti-corruption frameworks. This has resulted in a system where public wealth is habitually channelled into private hands, eroding trust in governance and perpetuating a culture where impunity thrives. Corruption further distorts national priorities, as leaders pursue short-term rent extraction over the difficult but necessary work of reform and institution-building. The negative consequences are felt most intensely by ordinary Nigerians, forced to endure failing educational systems, dilapidated infrastructure, and inadequate medical care.

Economic mismanagement exacerbates the impact of corruption and the resource curse. Nigeria’s excessive reliance on oil revenue has rendered its economy highly susceptible to external shocks, such as the dramatic decline in oil prices in 2014, which plunged the country into recession and widespread hardship. Instead of investing in diversification and the development of human capital, governments have repeatedly squandered oil windfalls on unsustainable subsidies, ill-conceived projects, and extensive patronage networks. Fiscal irresponsibility, marked by persistent deficits and mounting debt, has constrained the government’s ability to respond to crises or to invest meaningfully in long-term development. Monetary policy has also been inconsistent, undermining investor confidence and contributing to inflationary pressures. Attempts to reform the oil sector, including the much-debated Petroleum Industry Bill, have been slow-moving and often mired in political controversy, further discouraging both domestic and international investment and stifling innovation.

The absence of coherent, long-term planning has left Nigeria ill-prepared to leverage its oil wealth for national transformation. As a result, the country remains ensnared in recurrent cycles of boom and bust, with minimal tangible benefits for its population after decades of resource extraction. Political instability has further compounded these economic difficulties. Since independence, Nigeria has experienced repeated military coups, ethno-religious strife, and the rise of insurgent groups such as Boko Haram. This persistent instability not only disrupts daily life but also deters both local and foreign investment, undermines economic growth, and diverts governmental focus from essential development initiatives. The oil-abundant Niger Delta has been especially affected, with frequent outbreaks of violence, sabotage, and kidnappings rooted in grievances related to resource control and environmental degradation. Government responses have often been forceful, at times exacerbating tensions and unrest. Such instability also frustrates efforts to establish effective institutions, as frequent changes in leadership and policy undermine both continuity and the pursuit of long-term objectives. In the absence of a stable political environment, Nigeria has found it challenging to attract the investment and expertise required to modernise its economy and elevate the standard of living for its citizens.

Despite its oil wealth, Nigeria remains one of the most unequal societies in Africa. The benefits of resource extraction are largely concentrated among a narrow elite, while millions of ordinary Nigerians persist in poverty. The disparities in income are stark, and access to fundamental services such as education, healthcare, and clean water remains beyond the reach of many. These inequalities are deepened by regional divisions, with oil-producing areas and major cities enjoying greater prosperity than rural and northern regions. Ethnic and religious differences further complicate the equitable distribution of resources, as various groups compete for access to oil revenues and political influence. The ongoing prevalence of poverty and inequality undermines social cohesion and breeds discontent, providing fertile ground for conflict and instability. It also restricts Nigeria’s capacity to harness the potential of its population for national development.

Environmental degradation is another profound consequence of oil extraction in Nigeria, particularly evident in the Niger Delta. Decades of oil spills, gas flaring, and pollution have decimated farmlands, contaminated water sources, and devastated the livelihoods of local residents. The environmental costs associated with oil production have often been overshadowed by the pursuit of revenue, leaving a legacy of ecological damage that will take generations to remediate. Rather than benefiting from the nation’s oil wealth, local communities have borne the brunt of its negative impacts, including health problems, loss of livelihood, and displacement. This in turn fuels resentment, protest, and further instability. Environmental degradation also threatens food security and economic opportunities, thereby reinforcing cycles of poverty and inequality. Efforts to address environmental damage have thus far been inadequate and sluggish, with compensation mechanisms frequently undermined by inefficiency and corruption. The failure to enforce environmental standards is symptomatic of broader governance and accountability challenges.

Nigeria’s fortunes are closely linked to the dynamics of global oil markets and the interests of foreign entities. The volatility of international oil prices has subjected the country to sudden economic shocks, while multinational oil companies exercise considerable influence over domestic production and regulatory frameworks. This dependence on external actors has often limited Nigeria’s negotiating power, resulting in contracts and revenue-sharing arrangements that do not always serve the national interest. Foreign interests, including governments and corporations, have at times colluded with local elites to secure advantageous access to oil resources, thereby exacerbating corruption and mismanagement. The global demand for oil has also incentivised rapid and frequently unsustainable extraction, with scant regard for environmental or social ramifications. International financial institutions have advocated for various reforms, but such measures have sometimes prioritised market liberalisation over social protections, leaving many Nigerians vulnerable to the vicissitudes of the global economy. The complex interrelationship between domestic and international factors has further complicated efforts to channel oil wealth into sustainable national development.

In conclusion, Nigeria’s persistent poverty amidst ample oil reserves constitutes a tragic tale of missed opportunities and systemic failures. The resource curse, endemic corruption, economic mismanagement, political instability, social inequality, environmental degradation, and external influences have all contributed to the current state of affairs. Nevertheless, the future is not predetermined. To overcome this paradox, Nigeria must embrace bold reforms, including economic diversification, institutional strengthening, serious anti-corruption efforts, investment in education and health, and a steadfast commitment to environmental sustainability. Above all, political stability and inclusive governance are indispensable if all Nigerians are to benefit from the country’s wealth. The challenges are undeniably daunting, yet the potential for progress remains vast. With effective policies and visionary leadership, Nigeria can finally leverage its abundant resources for the benefit of all its citizens. The time for decisive action is now, and the world’s attention remains fixed upon the country’s next steps.

Monday

Pope Leo XIV Urges End To US-Israeli Attack On Iran As Middle East War As Bombing Rages On

CC™ Global News

By Staff

Pope Leo XIV on Sunday appealed for an end to the “roar of bombs” in the Middle East, as the conflict sparked by the United States–Israeli air strikes on Iran entered its ninth day.

Speaking after the Angelus prayer, the US-born pontiff said developments from the region “continues to arouse deep dismay.”

According to him, the situation has been worsened by escalating violence, destruction, and a growing climate of hatred and fear, alongside apprehension that the conflict could spread to other countries in the region.

The pope warned that such escalation could drag additional states into instability, specifically mentioning Lebanon, which he described as a beloved nation that risks once again being engulfed by turmoil.

Meanwhile, Iran was on Sunday preparing to announce its new supreme leader after the US-Israeli air strikes destroyed fuel depots and ignited fires across parts of Tehran, leaving the city covered in thick smoke.

In retaliation, Iranian missile and drone strikes have reportedly targeted several Gulf countries and other locations across the Middle East.

For his part, Donald Trump has not ruled out the possibility of deploying American ground troops to Iran, although he maintains that the military campaign is progressing rapidly.

Pope Leo urged all sides to halt hostilities and pursue peaceful engagement.

He said he was praying “that the roar of the bombs may cease, the weapons may fall silent, and a space for dialogue may open in which the voices of the peoples may be heard.”

Sunday

US Unemployment Edges Higher As Labour Market Shows Signs Of Cooling

CC™ Econometrics

By Staff

The United States labour market showed further signs of cooling in February 2026, as the unemployment rate rose slightly to 4.4 per cent from 4.3 per cent recorded in January.

The latest figure came in marginally above market expectations and moved closer to November’s four-year high of 4.5 per cent, suggesting a gradual softening in labour market conditions after a prolonged period of strength.

Data released during the week indicated that the number of unemployed persons increased by 203,000 to 7.57 million in February. At the same time, total employment declined by 185,000 to 162.91 million.

The labour force, however, recorded a modest increase of 18,000, bringing the total to 170.48 million. Despite the slight expansion, the labour force participation rate slipped by 0.1 percentage point to 62.0 per cent, signalling a marginal decline in workforce engagement.

Analysts noted that the combination of rising unemployment and falling employment points to a labour market that is gradually losing momentum amid a broader moderation in economic activity.

However, broader indicators of labour market slack presented a more mixed picture. The U-6 unemployment rate — a wider measure that includes discouraged workers and individuals working part-time for economic reasons — declined to 7.9 per cent from 8.1 per cent in January.

The improvement in the broader underemployment measure suggests that some previously underutilised workers may be finding more stable employment opportunities, partially offsetting the headline rise in the jobless rate.

Economists say the latest figures reinforce the view that the U.S. labour market is transitioning from the exceptionally tight conditions seen in recent years toward a more balanced phase. Despite the gradual easing, the labour market remains relatively resilient by historical standards, with unemployment still well below long-term averages.

Market observers also note that the evolving labour trends will be closely monitored by policymakers as they assess the pace of economic growth, inflation pressures, and the appropriate direction of monetary policy in the months ahead.

Saturday

Do not interrupt me – Arise TV anchor Rufai Oseni clashes with Israeli Ambassador

CC™ Global News

By Staff

Arise TV anchor, Rufai Oseni has clashed with Israeli Ambassador, Michael Freeman on live TV, confronting him over Israel’s alleged historical atrocities, Gaza casualties, and purported nuclear hypocrisy.

During a heated live interview on Arise TV on Friday, Rufai Oseni directly challenged the Israeli ambassador over Israel’s historical military actions and current controversies.

Oseni, visibly frustrated, interrupted the ambassador multiple times to make his point, saying: “I mean, we can go back historically. I can tell you about the King David Hotel bombings, Argon, Shargon, and all the other atrocities, even Gaza, where Israel initially denied the number of people killed before eventually acknowledging them. And what they are doing in the West Bank… a lot of crimes are being investigated against the Israeli army. So if you think Israel is the same…”

When Ambassador Freeman attempted to respond, Oseni stopped him, emphasizing: “Hang on a minute, let me finish. Do not interrupt me, ambassador. Let me finish.

“Alright, so you can go ahead and claim all of that, but the interesting part is also the hypocrisy. Only last year, during the 12-day war, you said the words of Donald Trump and Israel allies they are obliterating the nuclear program in Iran.”

Responding to the allegations, Ambassador Freeman, pushed back against some of Oseni’s claims saying; “Well, before I go to the second part, some of the statements you made in the beginning were outrageous and absolutely based on no facts. For example, Israel still disputes some of these numbers of people in Gaza that the Hamas authorities claim. We absolutely do not accept those figures. Reports suggesting otherwise are simply not true, and I can say that categorically now.”

“Your question was about the 12 day war, and you’re right. In the 12 day war, Israel and America destroyed and set back, rather, Iran’s nuclear program.

“But over the last less than one year, Iran the Iranian leadership began again even when Iran has no water, the people in Tehran haven’t got water. They are dealing with one of the worst economic crisis they’ve ever had.

“But the Iranian leadership decided they were going to invest $1 billion, 1 billion with a B, into building a new nuclear program and investing in restarting and rebuilding their nuclear program by digging deeper under the ground, by looking to enrich uranium even further, by developing their missile program and their ballistic missile program, and in all of the negotiations with the Americans, the Iranians made it very clear they were not prepared at any point to give up nuclear enrichment.

“They were not prepared to give up their ballistic missile program, and they were not prepared to stop sponsoring terror organizations throughout the region and throughout the world,” Freeman explained.

Thursday

Spain's Pedro Sánchez hits back at Trump threat to sever trade saying 'no to war'

CC™ Global News

By Global NewsDesk 

Pedro Sánchez has delivered a strong rebuttal to US President Donald Trump's threat to end trade with Spain by restating his opposition to war and what he called the "breakdown of international law".

In a 10-minute televised address, the Spanish prime minister reflected on the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, as well as the Iraq War more than 20 years ago, and said the Spanish government's position could be summed up as "no to war".

Trump threatened to impose a full trade embargo on Spain in response to its refusal to allow the US to use the jointly run bases at Morón and Rotafor to strike Iran.

Spain has been terrible," Trump said during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Tuesday.

"We're going to cut off all trade with Spain. We don't want anything to do with Spain," he added.

Merz said later he had told Trump very clearly that he could not conclude a separate trade agreement with Germany or all of Europe but not with Spain.

In response to the US economic threat, the Élysée Palace said French President Emmanuel Macron had conveyed his "solidarity" with Spain during a phone conversation with Sánchez on Wednesday. European Council President António Costa also said he had spoken to the Spanish leader "to express the EU's full solidarity".

Trump accused Spain on Tuesday of being a "terrible partner" in Nato for failing to increase its defence budget in line with a target of 5% of economic output (GDP).

Earlier this year, Sánchez drew Trump's ire by speaking out against the US military incursion into Venezuela.

Sánchez said in his televised address from the prime minister's official residence in Madrid on Wednesday that the government was studying economic measures to counter the impact of the conflict on Spaniards, though he avoided directly referring to Trump's trade threat.

"The question is not if we are on the side of the ayatollahs [Iran's clerical rulers] - nobody is. The question is whether we are in favour of peace and international legality," he said.

“You cannot answer one illegality with another, because that is how the great catastrophes of humanity begin."

Spain's Socialist prime minister explained that the government's position was comparable to its stance on Ukraine and Gaza. Sánchez has been a vociferous critic of Israel's military response to the Hamas attacks in 2023.

Spain has been among Europe's most outspoken governments on Gaza, describing Israel's actions there as "genocide" and acknowledging a Palestinian state before many other EU members did.

That position was in step with his coalition partners to his left and, broadly speaking, with Spanish attitudes toward the Middle East.

Looking back to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, which he said had failed to achieve its goals and had made life worse for ordinary people, he warned that the attacks on Iran could have a similar economic impact for millions.

His reference to the Iraq invasion will connect with many Spanish voters. Spain's support at the time from the conservative People's Party (PP) government was deeply unpopular, and triggered mass anti-war protests.

Many believe it also lay the groundwork for the Socialist Party's surprise election victory in March 2004, days after Madrid had been hit by deadly jihadist bombings.

Sánchez reminded Spaniards of the "Azores trio" - the then-US President George W Bush, the UK's Tony Blair and Spanish conservative leader José María Aznar - who had met on a Portuguese base in the region days before the Iraq invasion.

He said they had handed Europeans the "gift" of "a more insecure world and worse life".

The Spanish leader's stance contrasts strongly with that of Merz, who told German TV on Tuesday that regime change in Iran would leave the world "a little better off", though he also said this was "not without risk and we would also have to bear the consequences".

Unlike Spain's fellow Nato allies - the UK, France and Greece - it has not yet committed to any military involvement in response to the war.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Wednesday that Spain had "agreed to co-operate" with the US military after hearing Trump's message "loud and clear" - a claim Spanish foreign minister José Manuel Albares categorically denied, telling local media that his government's position "has not changed one iota".

Aside from the fierce criticism Sánchez has faced from the US, his coalition government has faced months of enormous political pressure, generating constant speculation that its collapse could be imminent.

It has been struggling to maintain its parliamentary majority, which includes an array of left-wing and regional nationalist parties.

Allegations of corruption against several of his allies and inner circle have severely weakened his position.

In Spain's deeply polarised politics, much of the support for Sánchez is driven as much by concerns about the country's right and far-right as it is by endorsement of his leadership and policies.

Standing up to the US president may have electoral benefits for the Socialist leader.

A recent poll by the CIS research institute found that 77% of Spaniards had a "bad" or "very bad" opinion of Trump, suggesting that even many right-wing voters may back Sánchez on this issue.

However, there is now uncertainty in Spain over whether Trump's threats will translate into some form of economic reprisals, and many Spaniards will be watching this drama nervously.

Wednesday

Hallmarks of a Terrorist State: “We’ll continue to target any Iranian regime leader for assassination”, Israel threatens

CC™ Global News

By Jesutobiloba Adedapo

The Israeli Defense Minister, Israel Katz, has threatened that his country will continue to target any leader appointed by the Iranian regime leader for assassination.

The threat, which was made by Katz in a post on his official X handle, has further escalated the longstanding rivalry between the two nations.

He warned, sternly, that any leader appointed by what he described as “the Iranian regime” to advance hostile operations against Israel, the United States and regional countries could face targeted elimination.

The Israeli Defense Minister wrote, “Every leader appointed by the Iranian terror regime to continue and lead the plan to destroy Israel, to threaten the United States and the free world and the countries of the region, and to suppress the Iranian people, will be an unequivocal target for elimination”.

In the post, Katz framed the statement as part of Israel’s broader security posture against Tehran’s strategic influence in the Middle East.

Continuing, the Defense Minister said, “It does not matter what his name is or the place where he hides.”

He added, “The Prime Minister and I have instructed the IDF to prepare and act by all means to carry out the mission as an integral part of the objectives of Operation ‘Lion’s Roar’.

“We will continue to act with full force, together with our American partners, to crush the regime’s capabilities and create the conditions for the Iranian people to overthrow it and replace it”, he stressed.

Iranian state media and international media, it will be recalled, confirmed few days ago that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed during the initial wave of attacks, along with other senior Iranian officials, marking the most dramatic escalation between the two adversaries in decades.

The operation, involving over 200 Israeli aircraft striking targets across Tehran, marks a historic escalation intended to destabilise the government and potentially trigger an internal overthrow of the regime

The attacks have sparked immense tension in the Gulf region, with Iran reportedly targeting U.S. bases in a series of retaliatory strikes.

Katz wrote on his official X handle, saying any leader appointed by what he described as “the Iranian regime” to advance hostile operations against Israel, the United States and regional countries could face targeted elimination.

Tuesday

While the world looks away - 169 Massacred in northern South Sudan

CC™ Global News

By Staff

At least 169 people have been killed and buried in a mass grave in South Sudan, two local officials told AFP Monday, the latest incident as the country sees a dramatic increase in violence.

The desperately poor country has seen a surge in violence throughout the nation, as forces loosely allied to either the opposition or government troops under President Salva Kiir clash.

Thousands have been displaced as a result.

“A total of 169 bodies have been laid to rest in a mass grave,” Elizabeth Achol, the minister of health in northern Ruweng Administrative Area, told AFP by telephone.

The local information minister, James Monyluak, gave the same toll following the early Sunday morning attack but also warned “the figure may increase further if more bodies are discovered”. He told AFP by phone that the dead included women, children and elderly people.

Around 50 others were wounded and transferred to medical facilities in Abyei and Warrap State for treatment, Monyluak said.

A diplomatic source told AFP the initial information over the Abiemnom incident indicated the attack was conducted by a Nuer group, potentially in revenge for the killing of some traders.

No group has claimed responsibility for the incident.

Monyluak said many residents had fled to nearby villages, while others had sought protection at the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) compound in the county.

“The security situation has since stabilised, with government security forces deployed and now in control of the area,” he added.

A UNMISS spokesperson said following the violence, peacekeepers were “temporarily sheltering some 1,000 civilians within our base in the area and providing emergency medical care to the injured”.

Monday

Outrageous: FIFA president says players who cover mouths when speaking could be sent off…..

CC™ News

By Global Sports Desk

FIFA president Gianni Infantino has suggested players who cover their mouths while talking to opponents could be sent off, in light of racism allegations against Benfica’s Gianluca Prestianni.

Argentina’s Prestianni was accused of racially abusing Real Madrid forward Vinicius Junior during a Champions League game last month, while covering his mouth with his shirt.

The issue was brought up at Saturday’s meeting of the International Football Association Board (IFAB).

“If a player covers his mouth and says something, and this has a racist consequence, then he has to be sent off, obviously,” Infantino told Sky News.

“There must be a presumption that he has said something he shouldn’t have said, otherwise he wouldn’t have had to cover his mouth.

“I simply do not understand — if you don’t have something to hide, you don’t hide your mouth when you say something. That’s it, as simple as that.

“And these are actions that we can take and we have to take in order to be serious about our fight against racism.”

The next FIFA Congress will be held next month in Vancouver, where football’s governing body could decide to implement measures to stop players covering their mouths at this year’s World Cup.

Infantino also floated the possibility of different punishments for racist abuse depending on whether or not the guilty player publicly apologises.

“Maybe we should also think about not just punishing, but also somehow allowing, changing our culture, allowing players or whoever does something to apologise,” he added.

“You can do things that you don’t want to do in a moment of anger (and) apologise and then the sanction has to be different, to move one step further and maybe we should think about something like that as well.”

Prestianni was provisionally suspended for the second leg of the Champions League tie pending the outcome of a UEFA investigation, and could be banned for 10 matches if found guilty. He denies racially abusing Vinicius.