NEW YORK – An injection of cash that values Facebook at $50 billion will help it delay going public for at least another year, giving the company breathing room to focus on long-term ambition rather than short-term profit.
The infusion — $500 million from elite investment house Goldman Sachs and a Russian investor, according to a report by The New York Times — represents the most emphatic endorsement yet of Facebook's potential to make money in online social networking.
It places the company at twice the value of Internet giant Yahoo and about equal to what well-established names such as Boeing and Kraft Foods are worth on the open market.
More important, it buys time for Facebook to keep its books private and not have to cater to the demands of the market. And it gives 26-year-old founder Mark Zuckerberg room to grow into his role as the public face of a multinational company.
Zuckerberg is widely believed to be more comfortable operating behind the scenes, thinking about technology and business, than engaging in public discourse, says Standard & Poor's equity analyst Scott Kessler, who follows large Internet companies.
"There is still some question whether he has the persona to be a public CEO and, if he doesn't, would he be willing to cede control to someone who does," says Mark Heeson, president of the National Venture Capital Association, a trade group that represents firms that invest in startups. "That is probably an issue that Facebook's board has been discussing for some time."
As it nears the seventh anniversary of its founding in a Harvard dorm room, Facebook is already slightly more mature than Google was when it went public, in 2004. At the time, investors placed Google's value at about $24 billion.
By the time Google turned 7, in September 2005, its market value had ballooned to about $90 billion, and the company wound up with $6 billion in revenue that year.
Google, like Facebook, wanted to stay private as long as possible to avoid public scrutiny of its finances, investor complaints about its strategy and potential management distractions.
The $50 billion is more than twice as much as the market's valuation of Yahoo. It's also worth more than eBay, but still less than Amazon.com — not to mention Google, which now stands at nearly $200 billion.
Facebook has grown quickly as a business, even as it seeks to retain a start-up culture, valuing innovation, hiring the smartest engineers from its neighbors and gobbling up small tech companies.
It has swelled to more than 500 million users, about half of whom log in on a given day. Each month they share more than 30 billion links, notes, photos and other types of content. Facebook "Like" buttons are everywhere online.
Facebook is free and makes money from selling highly targeted ads. Investors are increasingly convinced it is destined to become a marketing mecca. It has cemented its place as the king of social media, much as Google did for online search.
The New York Times reported the investment over the weekend, citing unnamed people involved with the deal. Facebook and Goldman Sachs declined to comment Monday.
Russian investor Digital Sky Technologies, which focuses on Internet properties, already has a 10 percent stake in Facebook, but the nod from Goldman Sachs is a sign of just how big the Palo Alto, Calif.-based startup has become even outside tech circles.
Wedbush Morgan analyst Lou Kerner, who has been bullish on social media and Facebook in particular, says Facebook is well worth $50 billion.
He says it's still 15 percent less than the going rate on private stock exchanges such as SecondMarket and SharesPost, where stock is generally sold by former employees or early investors in these companies. Kerner thinks the company could trade at $100 billion if it went public.
Not that Facebook is in any rush. Zuckerberg has been coy about a possible initial public offering, recently telling CBS' "60 Minutes" that he doesn't see selling the company or going public as an end goal, as a lot of entrepreneurs seem to.
That approach is "like you win when you go public. And that's just not how I see it," he said in the broadcast, which aired Dec. 5.
There are many reasons for Facebook to put off an IPO, a big one being that it doesn't need the money, as the latest investment shows. Companies go public to get access to capital, and Facebook clearly has access to capital, Kerner says.
Going public is also a big time commitment for senior management — time they could otherwise spend running the company, he says. Zuckerberg has been deeply involved in Facebook since its founding and shows no signs of wanting to give that up to cash out. He's even pledged to give away at least half of his wealth along with a slew of much older billionaires such as Carl Icahn and Barry Diller.
And Facebook, which already faces government scrutiny for the way it handles the troves of personal information its users share, would be subject to even more poring eyes were it to go public, Kerner notes.
"If I'm Facebook, I don't think I ever want to go public," he says.
The company discloses very limited financial information now, but that will change if it amasses at least 500 shareholders. Once a company with at least $10 million in assets crosses that threshold, the Securities and Exchange Commission requires it to disclose its finances and other crucial information. That regulation triggered Google's IPO in 2004.
Exactly how many shareholders Facebook has is not publicly known. The Times said Goldman hopes to circumvent the rule by counting itself as just one investor while pooling investments from thousands of its own clients.
Separately, Facebook in 2008 created a restricted class of shares for new employees that can't be sold until the company goes public. The SEC exempted these shares from being counted toward the 500-stockholder cap.
The agency is looking into whether recent trading in private Facebook stock may be enough to require more disclosure.
Facebook hasn't said whether it is making money under the accounting rules used by public companies, though in 2009 it announced it was bringing in more than it was spending. Research firm eMarketer estimates that Facebook generated $1.29 billion in online ad revenue in 2010 and will rake in $1.76 billion in 2011.
Digital Sky Technologies — together with sister company Mail.ru, which had its IPO in London in November — already owned about 10 percent of Facebook.
A person answering the phone at the company's office in Moscow said no one was available to comment.
Microsoft also owns a small stake in Facebook. It invested $240 million in Facebook in 2007 in exchange for a 1.6 percent stake, at the time implying a valuation of $15 billion.
Goldman Sachs, by cozying up to Facebook now, could be gaining an inside track to handle the eventual IPO, says Reena Aggarwal, a Georgetown University finance professor specializing in investment banking and IPOs.
"This looks like a very smart move by Goldman because it helps them get their foot in the door," she said.
Source: AP News
Monday
Sunday
Former car thief Darrell Issa seeks to become "statesman"....?
The White House will need more accountants, not lawyers, when the GOP takes over the House.
The Obama administration was not corrupt in managing the stimulus; it was Congress’s mistake to fund it so freely.
That's the message Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) is offering a few days before he becomes chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, sounding a measured tone that is miles from the persona he projected when the chamber was under Democratic control.
During his two years in the minority, Issa was the strong-handed Republican who grabbed headlines despite having little power. He forced subpoenas, talked tough about the Obama administration and became one of the more prominent Republican lawmakers outside his party’s leadership.
Now, during his final two days before the oversight gavel is his, Issa is trying to show that the committee under his control will not conduct a perpetual witch hunt against the Obama administration. It will be a rush to cut back on government spending via doing away with waste, Issa signaled on three separate Sunday shows this week.
Issa said he would not investigate the White House's alleged job offer to outgoing Rep. Joe Sestak (D-Pa.) to nudge him out of his state's Senate primary — it turns out, he said, such offers are common even if they are wrong.
But he did give clues to who is on his radar, including Attorney General Eric Holder. On “Fox News Sunday,” Issa said Holder is to blame for lax oversight of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, election intimidation by the New Black Panther Party and WikiLeaks. He said Holder “isn’t doing enough.”
“So he's hurting this administration,” Issa said. “If you're hurting the administration, either stop hurting the administration or leave.”
The oversight committee currently has a broad mandate to review government activities but little sway over legislation. Issa said the Republican House would work on a whistleblower bill that incorporates situations like the recent leak of State Department cables – and such a bill would likely come through his committee.
“And we're going to do that right off the bat because the kind of transparency we need is not to have somebody outing what is said by diplomats in private,” Issa said in reference to the WikiLeaks revelations. “And we need to change that, and that's going to be a big part of our committee's oversight, is to get that right so the diplomats can do their job with confidence and people can talk to our government with confidence.”
Part of Issa's pre-112th Congress scene-setting includes walking back some of the more inflammatory comments he made in the past year. Instead of the Obama administration being corrupt in dealing with the stimulus – what Issa said in several ways in the past – the Californian is saying that it was partially Congress’s fault.
“It's more about Congress's mistake in funding,” Issa said.
When asked directly by host Harry Smith on CBS's "Face the Nation" whether the Obama administration is corrupt, Issa simply replied that the White House has played “fast and loose with the walking around money Congress gave them” – redistributing some of the blame to Capitol Hill.
And Issa gave some staffing suggestions to his friends in the Obama administration: It’s not lawyers you’ll need, it’s accountants to find waste in government programs.
“The president's Office of Management and Budget views $125 billion of misspending by Medicare, and yet, year after year, it doesn't change,” Issa said. “That's 10 percent of the deficit that would go away if we simply stop paying to people who don't exist their claims."
"It's more about the inspector generals than it is about lawyers in the White House," Issa added. "And the sooner the administration figures out that the enemy is the bureaucracy and the wasteful spending, not the other party, the better off we'll be.”
Source: Politico
The Obama administration was not corrupt in managing the stimulus; it was Congress’s mistake to fund it so freely.
That's the message Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) is offering a few days before he becomes chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, sounding a measured tone that is miles from the persona he projected when the chamber was under Democratic control.
During his two years in the minority, Issa was the strong-handed Republican who grabbed headlines despite having little power. He forced subpoenas, talked tough about the Obama administration and became one of the more prominent Republican lawmakers outside his party’s leadership.
Now, during his final two days before the oversight gavel is his, Issa is trying to show that the committee under his control will not conduct a perpetual witch hunt against the Obama administration. It will be a rush to cut back on government spending via doing away with waste, Issa signaled on three separate Sunday shows this week.
Issa said he would not investigate the White House's alleged job offer to outgoing Rep. Joe Sestak (D-Pa.) to nudge him out of his state's Senate primary — it turns out, he said, such offers are common even if they are wrong.
But he did give clues to who is on his radar, including Attorney General Eric Holder. On “Fox News Sunday,” Issa said Holder is to blame for lax oversight of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, election intimidation by the New Black Panther Party and WikiLeaks. He said Holder “isn’t doing enough.”
“So he's hurting this administration,” Issa said. “If you're hurting the administration, either stop hurting the administration or leave.”
The oversight committee currently has a broad mandate to review government activities but little sway over legislation. Issa said the Republican House would work on a whistleblower bill that incorporates situations like the recent leak of State Department cables – and such a bill would likely come through his committee.
“And we're going to do that right off the bat because the kind of transparency we need is not to have somebody outing what is said by diplomats in private,” Issa said in reference to the WikiLeaks revelations. “And we need to change that, and that's going to be a big part of our committee's oversight, is to get that right so the diplomats can do their job with confidence and people can talk to our government with confidence.”
Part of Issa's pre-112th Congress scene-setting includes walking back some of the more inflammatory comments he made in the past year. Instead of the Obama administration being corrupt in dealing with the stimulus – what Issa said in several ways in the past – the Californian is saying that it was partially Congress’s fault.
“It's more about Congress's mistake in funding,” Issa said.
When asked directly by host Harry Smith on CBS's "Face the Nation" whether the Obama administration is corrupt, Issa simply replied that the White House has played “fast and loose with the walking around money Congress gave them” – redistributing some of the blame to Capitol Hill.
And Issa gave some staffing suggestions to his friends in the Obama administration: It’s not lawyers you’ll need, it’s accountants to find waste in government programs.
“The president's Office of Management and Budget views $125 billion of misspending by Medicare, and yet, year after year, it doesn't change,” Issa said. “That's 10 percent of the deficit that would go away if we simply stop paying to people who don't exist their claims."
"It's more about the inspector generals than it is about lawyers in the White House," Issa added. "And the sooner the administration figures out that the enemy is the bureaucracy and the wasteful spending, not the other party, the better off we'll be.”
Source: Politico
iPhone alarm glitch leaves users fuming
NEW YORK – The bells weren't ringing for many iPhone users this New Year's weekend, when thanks to a glitch the alarms on Apple's iconic mobile phones failed to go off, causing many to oversleep.
It was the second time in just a few months that the alarm function on the phone failed to activate correctly, prompting an avalanche of complaints on the social networking micro-blog Twitter.
"Dear iPhone, why didn't your alarm go off this morning? I set six of them. I've now missed church. Thanks for nothing," said one user Sunday morning.
"Some sort of digital iPhone pandemic is going on. Alarm clock failure reports are pouring in from all sources around the globe," said another Twitter user.
Apple said in a message sent to Macworld magazine that the California-based company was aware of the problem. "We're aware of an issue related to non-repeating alarms set for January 1 or 2," spokeswoman Natalie Harrison said.
"Customers can set recurring alarms for those dates and all alarms will work properly beginning January 3."
The problem seemed to be affecting Apple's most recent versions of iPhones and iPods launched in November, but website Engadget suggested that it may also have hit earlier versions.
The problem first occurred when the clocks went back at the end of October and early November when Australian and British iPhone owners complained of being late for work because their alarms had not switched over to the new time.
Apple did not immediately respond to a query, regarding the purported glitch, on Sunday.
Source: AFP
It was the second time in just a few months that the alarm function on the phone failed to activate correctly, prompting an avalanche of complaints on the social networking micro-blog Twitter.
"Dear iPhone, why didn't your alarm go off this morning? I set six of them. I've now missed church. Thanks for nothing," said one user Sunday morning.
"Some sort of digital iPhone pandemic is going on. Alarm clock failure reports are pouring in from all sources around the globe," said another Twitter user.
Apple said in a message sent to Macworld magazine that the California-based company was aware of the problem. "We're aware of an issue related to non-repeating alarms set for January 1 or 2," spokeswoman Natalie Harrison said.
"Customers can set recurring alarms for those dates and all alarms will work properly beginning January 3."
The problem seemed to be affecting Apple's most recent versions of iPhones and iPods launched in November, but website Engadget suggested that it may also have hit earlier versions.
The problem first occurred when the clocks went back at the end of October and early November when Australian and British iPhone owners complained of being late for work because their alarms had not switched over to the new time.
Apple did not immediately respond to a query, regarding the purported glitch, on Sunday.
Source: AFP
Saturday
2011 promises to be a great year!
Editor's Note
First of all, a Happy New Year to all and hope everyone had a wonderful Christmas, in spite of the challenges of the last couple of years.
Well, 2011 promises to be a great year! Now, I know there are some folks running around with prophesies and visions of doom and gloom, but I refuse to be one of those "false prophets" and will encourage everyone to understand one thing:
"What you think in your heart and confess with your mouth, will ultimately manifest itself in your life".
I have always been baffled at how easy it is for people to always see the glass half-empty, forgetting that the same glass is also half-full; it all boils down to perception.
On my part, the last few years have been quite challenging (for a host of reasons) much like most Americans and folks across the globe, as a whole. My trials have however drawn me closer to God and as a Christian (not a religious person - yes, there is quite a difference), I have learned to treat each experience as an opportunity to learn more about myself and the people around me.
Through my experiences over the last few years, I have been privileged to come across some of the most wonderful human beings (of all races and persuasion), while also shedding a lot of "excess and disposable baggage" masquerading as friends and family.
Rather than being bitter from the experience, I have instead humbled myself and tried to see the opportunities that have been presented to me, with a view to ultimately becoming the person God wants me to be.
So, in this New Year (2011), throw away the garment of shame, pride, rebellion, despair, bitterness, reproach and derision and put on the Royal Garment of hope, perseverance, love, joy, favor, abundance and prosperity.
As Katherine Kuhlman once said, "God Can Do It Again". And yes, HE will, if you just trust HIM and decide in your heart that 2011 will not only be a great year, but it will be the beginning of the wonders that God has promised for your life, but which you never claimed.... until now.
Have a fabulous 2011 everyone!
First of all, a Happy New Year to all and hope everyone had a wonderful Christmas, in spite of the challenges of the last couple of years.
Well, 2011 promises to be a great year! Now, I know there are some folks running around with prophesies and visions of doom and gloom, but I refuse to be one of those "false prophets" and will encourage everyone to understand one thing:
"What you think in your heart and confess with your mouth, will ultimately manifest itself in your life".
I have always been baffled at how easy it is for people to always see the glass half-empty, forgetting that the same glass is also half-full; it all boils down to perception.
On my part, the last few years have been quite challenging (for a host of reasons) much like most Americans and folks across the globe, as a whole. My trials have however drawn me closer to God and as a Christian (not a religious person - yes, there is quite a difference), I have learned to treat each experience as an opportunity to learn more about myself and the people around me.
Through my experiences over the last few years, I have been privileged to come across some of the most wonderful human beings (of all races and persuasion), while also shedding a lot of "excess and disposable baggage" masquerading as friends and family.
Rather than being bitter from the experience, I have instead humbled myself and tried to see the opportunities that have been presented to me, with a view to ultimately becoming the person God wants me to be.
So, in this New Year (2011), throw away the garment of shame, pride, rebellion, despair, bitterness, reproach and derision and put on the Royal Garment of hope, perseverance, love, joy, favor, abundance and prosperity.
As Katherine Kuhlman once said, "God Can Do It Again". And yes, HE will, if you just trust HIM and decide in your heart that 2011 will not only be a great year, but it will be the beginning of the wonders that God has promised for your life, but which you never claimed.... until now.
Have a fabulous 2011 everyone!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)